How to Use Figma AI for Prototype Interactions and Layer Hygiene

Figma AI can add multiple prototyping interactions between selected frames and can rename layers for cleaner files. Official Make interactions with AI help: select frames, open the Prototype tab, click Add interactions, preview, then Keep it. Consistent naming improves results. Official agent feature tables list deeper prototyping support as coming soon, so use Add interactions for AI wired flows today and the agent for rename and bulk hygiene. Overview: /explore/figma-ai.

This guide covers interaction selection, preview habits, and rename passes. Pair with the agent at /blog/how-to-use-figma-agent-for-conversational-design.

When interactions and layer hygiene are the right job

Use Add interactions when frames are stable enough for a basic click through. Use Rename layers when random Frame 23 names block handoff or confuse AI prototyping. Wait on complex prototype authoring from the agent until your account shows that support as available.

Step by step workflow

1. Stabilize frames and names

Finalize main layout. Rename noisy layers first when names are meaningless.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Prep Frames: Onboarding 1, Onboarding 2, Onboarding 3 Rename: Actions → Rename layers Goal: Continue and Back affordances clear. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Prep Frames: Onboarding 1, Onboarding 2, Onboarding 3 Rename: Actions → Rename layers Goal: Continue and Back affordances clear" that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Prep Frames: Onboarding 1, Onboarding 2, Onboarding 3 Rename: Actions → Rename layers Goal: Continue and Back affordances clear" requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

2. Add interactions with AI

Select the frames, open Prototype, click Add interactions. Preview from the banner, then Keep it or edit connections.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Flow Continue on step 1 → step 2 Continue on step 2 → step 3 Back returns to previous. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Flow Continue on step 1 → step 2 Continue on step 2 → step 3 Back returns to previous" that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Flow Continue on step 1 → step 2 Continue on step 2 → step 3 Back returns to previous" requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

3. Edit and tidy

Adjust individual interactions manually. Re run rename after structural merges. Ask the agent for bulk rename if the page is large.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: QA [ ] Primary path works in preview [ ] Back path works [ ] Extra connections removed [ ] Layer names readable for handoff. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "QA [ ] Primary path works in preview [ ] Back path works [ ] Extra connections removed [ ] Layer names readable for handoff" that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "QA [ ] Primary path works in preview [ ] Back path works [ ] Extra connections removed [ ] Layer names readable for handoff" requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Practical interaction and rename examples

Onboarding linear

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Add interactions: Continue advances onboarding 1 to 3. Back returns to previous.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Add interactions: Continue advances onboarding 1 to 3. Back returns to previous." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Add interactions: Continue advances onboarding 1 to 3. Back returns to previous." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Tab nav

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Link tab bar items to Home, Search, and Profile top level frames.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Link tab bar items to Home, Search, and Profile top level frames." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Link tab bar items to Home, Search, and Profile top level frames." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Modal open

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Tap Filter opens Filter modal frame. Close returns to Results.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Tap Filter opens Filter modal frame. Close returns to Results." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Tap Filter opens Filter modal frame. Close returns to Results." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Settings drill in

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Rows navigate to Detail frames. Back chevron returns to Settings list.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Rows navigate to Detail frames. Back chevron returns to Settings list." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Rows navigate to Detail frames. Back chevron returns to Settings list." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Checkout steps

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Cart to Shipping to Payment to Confirm. Edit links after AI pass if needed.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Cart to Shipping to Payment to Confirm. Edit links after AI pass if needed." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Cart to Shipping to Payment to Confirm. Edit links after AI pass if needed." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Marketing CTA

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Hero Get started navigates to Pricing. Nav Pricing also links to Pricing.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Hero Get started navigates to Pricing. Nav Pricing also links to Pricing." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Hero Get started navigates to Pricing. Nav Pricing also links to Pricing." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Empty to create

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Empty state Create project navigates to New project form.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Empty state Create project navigates to New project form." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Empty state Create project navigates to New project form." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Success dismiss

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Success toast OK returns to dashboard frame.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Success toast OK returns to dashboard frame." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Success toast OK returns to dashboard frame." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Rename page

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Rename all layers on this page with Frame and Component prefixes matching visible roles.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Rename all layers on this page with Frame and Component prefixes matching visible roles." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Rename all layers on this page with Frame and Component prefixes matching visible roles." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Rename after merge

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Re run rename after boolean merge on icon set frames.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Re run rename after boolean merge on icon set frames." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Re run rename after boolean merge on icon set frames." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

More copyable examples

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Agent rename bulk Ask the agent: rename layers in selection to reflect UI role. Keep existing component names.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Agent rename bulk Ask the agent: rename layers in selection to reflect UI role. Keep existing component names." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Agent rename bulk Ask the agent: rename layers in selection to reflect UI role. Keep existing component names." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Preview QA After Add interactions, preview and delete accidental cross links between unrelated frames.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Preview QA After Add interactions, preview and delete accidental cross links between unrelated frames." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Preview QA After Add interactions, preview and delete accidental cross links between unrelated frames." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Nav menu Header links jump to Features, Pricing, and FAQ sections on the marketing page frames.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Nav menu Header links jump to Features, Pricing, and FAQ sections on the marketing page frames." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Nav menu Header links jump to Features, Pricing, and FAQ sections on the marketing page frames." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Wizard skip Skip on step 1 jumps to dashboard. Continue still advances the wizard.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Wizard skip Skip on step 1 jumps to dashboard. Continue still advances the wizard." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Wizard skip Skip on step 1 jumps to dashboard. Continue still advances the wizard." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Hover note After AI pass, manually add hover to desktop only buttons if needed for the test script.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Hover note After AI pass, manually add hover to desktop only buttons if needed for the test script." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Hover note After AI pass, manually add hover to desktop only buttons if needed for the test script." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Layer hygiene pass Collapse and rename before sending the file to engineering.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Layer hygiene pass Collapse and rename before sending the file to engineering." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Layer hygiene pass Collapse and rename before sending the file to engineering." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Flow document Add a comment listing the happy path frames after interactions are kept.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Flow document Add a comment listing the happy path frames after interactions are kept." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Flow document Add a comment listing the happy path frames after interactions are kept." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Scenario:
A realistic figma-ai workflow is being prepared for Use Figma AI for First Draft Explorations using figma-ai. The starting requirement is: Do not assume agent proto If agent prototyping still shows coming soon, stick to Prototype tab Add interactions.. The work should be tested on a representative input first so the result can be reviewed before the same process is applied to the full project or production workload.

Objective:
Create a production-ready result for "Do not assume agent proto If agent prototyping still shows coming soon, stick to Prototype tab Add interactions." that directly supports the article use case. The output should be specific, reviewable, and reproducible rather than a generic demonstration. Keep the requested goal as the primary outcome and avoid adding unrelated features, assumptions, or unsupported capabilities.

Inputs:
Use the actual source material required for this task, together with the intended audience, destination, format, and quality requirements. Specify relevant files, text, URLs, structured data, reference assets, dimensions, language, tone, timing, model or generation settings, credentials, field mappings, or integration values when they apply. Keep secrets out of the example and use the product's supported credential or configuration mechanism.

Workflow:
1. Start with one representative input that contains the important characteristics of the real workload.
2. Configure figma-ai specifically for the requested task and make the important settings explicit.
3. Run the first pass and inspect the result against the objective.
4. Correct only the settings or source material responsible for a failed requirement instead of changing everything at once.
5. Validate the intermediate result before passing it to the next step.
6. When the result meets the requirements, save the successful configuration so the same process can be repeated consistently.
7. If this is a multi-step workflow, verify each handoff and keep a clear fallback or review path for failures.

Requirements:
The example must use supported functionality only. Do not invent product features, pricing, limits, integrations, model names, API behavior, or unavailable settings. Preserve important source data and formatting. Validate required fields before processing, handle empty or invalid input explicitly, prevent accidental duplicate processing where relevant, and stop or route the item for review when a required step fails. For credentials, use the supported secure configuration rather than placing secrets directly in the content.

Expected output:
The final result should directly satisfy the "Do not assume agent proto If agent prototyping still shows coming soon, stick to Prototype tab Add interactions." requirement and be understandable without guessing what was supplied or configured. A successful run should produce the intended output in the requested format, with the important values and workflow decisions clear enough to reproduce the result. If the workflow can fail, the expected behavior should also make the failure visible and provide a clear next action instead of silently producing an incomplete result.

Tips

• Rename before Add interactions when names are noisy
• Select only the frames in the flow
• Preview before Keep it
• Edit individual connections after AI
• Use the agent for bulk rename and organization
• Confirm agent prototyping support status before relying on chat to wire complex flows

Verification notes

Add interactions steps come from Make interactions with AI help. Rename layers is listed in Use AI tools in Figma Design. Agent prototyping support should be confirmed against the current agent features table. When plan access, seat rules, or credit behavior differ from memory, open help.figma.com and your AI balance. Limits change, so do not promise client timelines from outdated screenshots.

Keep a short session log beside the file: tool used, selection, prompt, and the one change you will try next. That habit turns four variants or parallel agent threads into learning instead of noise.

When Actions are missing, check whether an admin disabled Figma AI for the workspace before rewriting prompts. Access problems look like prompt problems until you confirm settings.

Treat the first AI pass as a sketch. Compare against your spacing grid, type styles, and accessibility targets before inviting stakeholders.

If you collaborate, store winning prompts on a shared page next to the library link. Reuse the skeleton and change only product nouns or channel constraints.

Separate exploration files from production libraries. Explore freely in drafts, then rebuild keepers with real components before handoff.

Close each session by naming frames clearly and discarding dead ends. A clean page saves time when someone asks for the pricing riff from Tuesday.

Prefer concrete product language over vague vibes alone. Screen type, primary action, and one constraint outperform a pile of adjectives.

Confirm AI credit balance and reset date before large image or agent batches. Shared credits power many Figma AI surfaces.

Rename layers before Add interactions when names are random. Official help notes naming quality improves AI prototype results.

Preview from the banner and edit individual connections after Keep it. AI flows are a starting graph, not final UX.

If you ask the agent to wire complex prototypes, confirm whether prototyping is still listed as coming soon in current agent docs.

Basic AI interactions are for click through clarity, not for encoding every microinteraction in a test script. Add hover and conditional logic manually when the study needs them.

Naming quality is a prototype dependency. Official help links better interaction results to consistent layer names.

Select the full happy path before Add interactions. Partial selections create orphan frames and missing Back targets.

Preview is mandatory. AI can add sensible links and still create cross links you do not want in a moderated test.

Keep it is not the end. Edit or delete individual connections, then document the intended path in a comment for teammates.

Rename layers again after large structural edits. Old names linger on merged groups and confuse Dev Mode readers.

Use the agent for bulk rename and comment summaries when the page is large. Use Prototype tab Add interactions for wiring while agent prototyping remains limited or coming soon.

Stabilize layout before you invest in flows. Prototyping a moving target doubles rework when frames are renamed or replaced.

Name destination frames before wiring. Add interactions cannot invent clear IA if every frame is still called Frame.

Limit the first AI pass to the happy path. Alternate paths are easier to add manually once the spine works in preview.

Share the prototype link only after Keep it and a full click through. Reviewers should not debug unfinished AI graphs.

Layer hygiene is a weekly habit on active files. Waiting until handoff creates rename marathons under deadline pressure.

Write the test script before you wire. Knowing the tasks helps you select the right frames and ignore decorative screens.

After Keep it, verify Back behavior twice. Missing return paths are the most common AI interaction gap in linear flows.

Rename layers with role language that engineers understand: Header, PrimaryCTA, FormFieldEmail. Clever names age poorly.

Prototype AI is a speed layer on top of sound IA. If the frame map is confused, fix information architecture before adding links.

Handoff checklists should include renamed layers and a working happy path preview link. Both are faster with Figma AI when used in that order.

Common mistakes

• Prototyping before layout is stable
• Selecting half the flow frames
• Accepting Keep it without preview
• Leaving Frame 12 style names for handoff
• Assuming the agent can fully author prototypes while docs list that as coming soon
• Wiring every button before the primary path works

Related Figma AI articles: /blog/how-to-use-figma-agent-for-conversational-design, /blog/how-to-use-figma-ai-to-replace-placeholder-content, and /blog/how-to-use-figma-ai-for-first-draft-explorations. Return to /explore/figma-ai for the broader guide set.